Craig Wright v Peter McCormack: Judge ruled that Craig Wright, who claims to be Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto, advanced false evidence.

Free Bitcoins: FreeBitcoin | BonusBitcoin

Coins Kaufen: Bitcoin.deAnycoinDirektCoinbaseCoinMama (mit Kreditkarte)Paxfull

Handelsplätze / Börsen: Bitcoin.de | KuCoinBinanceBitMexBitpandaeToro

Lending / Zinsen erhalten: Celsius NetworkCoinlend (Bot)

Cloud Mining: HashflareGenesis MiningIQ Mining


Advanced false evidence about Peter being the reason he was disinvited from some conferences or something, not false evidence about being Satoshi.

He’s absolutely not Satoshi, but let’s be accurate about what is happening.

“Chamberlain, however, concluded that Wright had “advanced a deliberately false case as to the dis-invitations from academic conferences.” Thus, the judge said, there would be “no injustice” in awarding just the one pound.”



[ad_2]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close